9/15/2023 0 Comments Log flume water ride cedar point![]() ![]() If you’re looking for bran muffin journalism, you can subscribe to the Monitor for $15. ![]() We’re about kicking down the door of thought everywhere and saying, “You are bigger and more capable than you realize. We have a mission beyond circulation, we want to bridge divides. We’re known as being fair even as the world becomes as polarized as at any time since the newspaper’s founding in 1908. We’re run by a church, but we’re not only for church members and we’re not about converting people. The Monitor is a peculiar little publication that’s hard for the world to figure out. And I’m going to argue that we change lives precisely because we force open that too-small box that most human beings think they live in. We’re the bran muffin of journalism.īut you know what? We change lives. We’re seen as being global, fair, insightful, and perhaps a bit too earnest. If you were to come up with a punchline to a joke about the Monitor, that would probably be it. Sometimes, we call things ‘boring’ simply because they lie outside the box we are currently in.” My work in Kenya, for example, was heavily influenced by a Christian Science Monitor article I had forced myself to read 10 years earlier. “Many things that end up” being meaningful, writes social scientist Joseph Grenny, “have come from conference workshops, articles, or online videos that began as a chore and ended with an insight. It is simply common sense,” said the watchdog group Project on Government Oversight earlier this month.Ībout a year ago, I happened upon this statement about the Monitor in the Harvard Business Review – under the charming heading of “do things that don’t interest you”: Justice Sonia Sotomayor has not recused herself from court cases involving publisher Penguin Random House, which has paid her millions in book royalties.“A demand for ethical constraints is not an attack on the Court or any single justice. That should change, say some experts, given the allegations against Justice Alito and recent revelations about gifts to Justice Clarence Thomas from billionaire Harlan Crow.This isn’t about attacking the court’s conservative majority, some insist. Singer had any interest in the cases before the court, he insisted.There’s been a code of conduct for federal court judges since 1973, but the Supreme Court isn’t bound by it. Singer’s hedge fund in a lawsuit that ultimately netted it $2.4 billion.Justice Alito has denied that he did anything wrong. In a prebuttal in The Wall Street Journal published prior to ProPublica’s release of the story – an unusual step – he said that the trip was personal hospitality, and thus he didn’t need to report it. In 2014, justices voted 7-1 in favor of Mr. That may have violated a federal law that requires justices to disclose most such gifts, according to the ProPublica story.Nor did Justice Alito recuse himself when cases involving businesses of the billionaire, Paul Singer, came before the court. Is it time for the Supreme Court to have a detailed, binding code of ethics?That’s a question sparked by the recent report from ProPublica that in 2008, Justice Samuel Alito took a luxury fishing trip to Alaska on a billionaire’s private jet.Justice Alito did not report the trip on his financial disclosure.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |